The 2013 Financial Statements of the Municipality of Kincardine contain the following entry
In July 2013 the council of the Municipality committed to selling the assets of Bruce Telecom At that date the tangible capital assets of Bruce Telecom were considered held for sale and were therefore recognized at their net recoverable amount and removed from tangible capital assets
The council accepted an offer to sell the tangible capital assets of Bruce Telecom on January 21 2014 for a price of $24M An impairment of 8,388, 297 resulted from writing down Bruce Telecoms tangible capital assets to this value
The revenue from Bruce Telecom in 2012 was around $18M with $17M in expenses. I do not know if those expenses include depreciation or not.
So the value of the assets of this corporation were $32.4M dollars and the company sold for $24 M with no further financial contribution required by the Municipality of Kincardine to Eastlink.
The 2013 Financial Statements of ONTC contain the following information about Ontera
Assets (in thousands)
Ontera Cost Accum Net Book
Deprec Value
Equipment 165,828 127,368 38,460
Buildings 6,751 4,421 2,330
Ontera
Sales revenue 28,408
Operating Expense 22,692
Excess of revenue over expenses before the undernoted 5,716
Amortization of capital assets 5,151
Employee future benefit expense 1,720
Gain on sale of capital assets - (26)
Interest expense 1,084
Deficiency of revenue over expenses (2,239)
Ontera was sold for $6M with a further capital contribution of $15M by the Ontario government.
I am no financial expert, and would welcome the opinion of someone knowledgeable about the details, but it seems to me that MNDM made a very poor deal for the Ontario government. The Competition Bureau may be doing the Ontario taxpayer a favour if they block this deal.
The need for the Competition Bureau to review this transaction has been known from the outset.....if indeed the deal is blocked, it will be very interesting to see MNDM's "Plan B".....and how long it takes them to let the public know what it is.
No comments:
Post a Comment